Current:Home > ContactSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Infinite Edge Capital
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-12 03:06:32
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Mississippi man charged with shooting 5 people after not being allowed into party
- Subway rider who helped restrain man in NYC chokehold death says he wanted ex-Marine to ‘let go’
- Guns smuggled from the US are blamed for a surge in killings on more Caribbean islands
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- DWTS' Gleb Savchenko Shares Why He Ended Brooks Nader Romance Through Text Message
- Why Game of Thrones' Maisie Williams May Be Rejoining the George R.R. Martin Universe
- Deion Sanders doubles down on vow to 99-year-old Colorado superfan
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- US inflation may have picked up in October after months of easing
Ranking
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Family of security guard shot and killed at Portland, Oregon, hospital sues facility for $35M
- Olivia Munn Randomly Drug Tests John Mulaney After Mini-Intervention
- MLS Star Marco Angulo Dead at 22 One Month After Car Crash
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Ben Foster Files for Divorce From Laura Prepon After 6 Years of Marriage
- Who will be in the top 12? Our College Football Playoff ranking projection
- Oprah Winfrey denies being paid $1M for Kamala Harris rally: 'I was not paid a dime'
Recommendation
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Lululemon, Disney partner for 34-piece collection and campaign: 'A dream collaboration'
Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight odds will shift the longer the heavyweight bout goes
What are the best financial advising companies? Help USA TODAY rank the top U.S. firms
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
Republican Gabe Evans ousts Democratic US Rep. Yadira Caraveo in Colorado
Contained, extinguished and mopping up: Here’s what some common wildfire terms mean
As the transition unfolds, Trump eyes one of his favorite targets: US intelligence