Current:Home > MyAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -Infinite Edge Capital
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-17 13:58:33
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (483)
Related
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Watch: Sam Kerr's goal for Australia equalizes World Cup semifinal before loss to England
- Maui animal shelter housing pets whose owners lost their homes to deadly fires
- Al Michaels addresses low energy criticism: 'You can’t let things like that distress you'
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Man sentenced to 11 years for sexual assault of girl during remote-learning class
- Plea negotiations could mean no 9/11 defendants face the death penalty, the US tells families
- Could HS football games in Florida be delayed or postponed due to heat? Answer is yes.
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Teen Mom's Catelynn Lowell and Tyler Baltierra Share the Hardest Part of Daughter Carly's Adoption
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Fracking Linked to Increased Cases of Lymphoma in Pennsylvania Children, Study Finds
- Britney Spears and Sam Asghari Break Up: Relive Every Piece of Their Romance
- What is a conservatorship? The legal arrangement at the center of Michael Oher's case.
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Invasive yellow-legged hornet spotted in U.S. for first time
- Michigan State University plans to sell alcohol at four home football games
- Ravens cornerback Marlon Humphrey to be sidelined by foot surgery
Recommendation
The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
Charles McGonigal, ex-FBI official who worked for sanctioned Russian oligarch, pleads guilty
Trump, co-defendants in Georgia election case expected to be booked in Fulton County jail, sheriff says
I Tried a $10 Makeup Melting Cleanser That Olivia Culpo Recommended and It’s a Total Game-Changer
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Dottie Fideli went viral when she married herself. There's much more to her story.
North Carolina GOP seeks to override governor’s veto of bill banning gender-affirming care for youth
Lahaina in pictures: Before and after the devastating Maui wildfires