Current:Home > MyFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Infinite Edge Capital
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-18 11:06:28
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (43)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Medicare announces plan to recoup billions from drug companies
- Selling Sunset Cast Reacts to Chrishell Stause and G Flip's Marriage
- Ron DeSantis wasn't always a COVID rebel: Looking back at the Florida governor's initial pandemic response
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Sen. John Fetterman is receiving treatment for clinical depression
- RHONJ: Melissa Gorga & Teresa Giudice's Feud Comes to an Explosive Conclusion Over Cheating Rumor
- What Really Happened to Princess Diana—and Why Prince Harry Got Busy Protecting Meghan Markle
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- How grown-ups can help kids transition to 'post-pandemic' school life
Ranking
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Selena Gomez Is Serving Up 2 New TV Series: All the Delicious Details
- Houston Lures Clean Energy Companies Seeking New Home Base
- How financial counseling at the pediatrician's office can help families thrive
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- The glam makeovers of Pakistan's tractors show how much farmers cherish them
- Charles Silverstein, a psychologist who helped destigmatize homosexuality, dies at 87
- SoCal Gas’ Settlement Over Aliso Canyon Methane Leak Includes Health Study
Recommendation
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
U.S. Intelligence Officials Warn Climate Change Is a Worldwide Threat
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Involved in Near Catastrophic 2-Hour Car Chase With Paparazzi
5 dogs killed in fire inside RV day before Florida dog show
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
One state looks to get kids in crisis out of the ER — and back home
Sen. John Fetterman is receiving treatment for clinical depression
Some Starbucks workers say Pride Month decorations banned at stores, but the company says that's not true